Ryan Bourne is Chair in Public Understanding of Economics at the Cato Institute.
A week may be a long time in politics, but a fortnight seems an eternity. A two-week period that started with Ministers urging everyone back to work, ended with “the rule of six,” Covid Marshalls, and discussion of curfews and a phone line for people to dob in neighbours for breaching pandemic laws.
If the sharp pivot in public health policy was a shock, the tone about enforcement was more jarring. It’s one thing to set clear guidance, buttressed with legally-enforceable regulations that, in reality, depend on an honour system. It’s another to brief papers of threatening enforcement of unpoliceable laws.
Gone is Boris Johnson the instinctive libertarian, imposing restrictions with a heavy heart. Conservatives now push authoritarian messaging. If nothing else, this doesn’t seem a sustainable way to get buy-in for infectious disease control. Especially since the government’s own mixed messages are a large part of the problem.
The implicit Coronavirus strategy has changed (again), but the Government has not publicly spelt it out. They aren’t trying to suppress the virus, it seems, but now want to protect much formal market activity to boost GDP (hence, school openings and “get back to work”), while sacrificing much socializing in recompense.
Without articulating that trade-off, the public is bemused: Rishi Sunak’s been subsidising indoor dining, but you now can’t have dinner with your own extended family. More than six kids can congregate at school. but not outside for a birthday party. Wedding rehearsal meals are banned, but wedding reception dinners for up to 30 are fine. You can mix with people at work, but can’t gather for a pint.
These rules strike people not so much as “confusing” (as journalists claim), but stupid. They know the virus isn’t choosy between work and leisure, and that the value of each is subjective. The British people complied with measures when they had public health coherence. Now, our Government is imposing its values of what’s important, but without saying so, and while brandishing a bigger stick.
So it’s unsurprising to see a more liberty-conscious pushback now. But I suspect this reflects more than just “Covid fatigue”, or lesser willingness to comply following the Dominic Cummings episode. At least some of it appears to be waning confidence in government’s abilities too.
For years, certain Conservatives have pushed the party to discuss “the good government can do” to distance themselves from us pesky libertarians, with our supposed vice-like grip on keeping the party freedom-oriented. It was always a delusional read on reality, but, as it happens, most British free-marketeers recognised early on that Covid-19 was a genuine collective action problem requiring government involvement and guidance.
Steve Baker’s emotional speech to Parliament exhibited the sentiments of most of us. We acknowledged the uncertainties, and so tolerated the crude initial lockdown, but demanded it be limited in time and used for something—preferably to build a competent, rapid test-and-trace system that could help normalise economic life and provide feedback about where risks occurred.
The failures in delivering even this, however, have been a textbook case study in why governments fail. The early centralised approach to testing and provision of PPE showed the limits of government planning. Lockdowns caused a raft of unintended consequences. Some vested interests have been given favourable treatment in policy or guidance. Officials downplayed the potential efficacy of masks, because they wrongly thought of markets as zero-sum, rather than dynamic. Recent attempts to fine-tune human behaviour week-to-week in the North West has proven about as successful as Keynesian fine-tuning of the economy in the 1970s. A libertarian making the case against government intervention couldn’t have scripted it better.
The consequence of all this is a growing hopelessness about government. Johnson is right that a daily rapid testing regime, for example, could be a gamechanger, as economists agree. But judging from the reaction I got last week in explaining why, the public thinks the state is incapable of delivering. I was regaled with horror story after horror story on access to even existing testing, now confirmed by news reports. Confidence in the “moonshot” is non-existent.
If state planning worked in winning War World Two, it was asked, why not have government build a New Jerusalem in peacetime? I wonder: will government failures in this pandemic lead to an attitudinal change away from faith in government action. just after the Conservatives have embraced it? Why would you trust people promising to use government power to “rebalance of the economy” by “doubling down on leveling up” when it has made such a pig’s ear of a core competence?
To be clear: I disagree with other libertarian friends who think the pandemic is by-and-large over, and that we can “get back to normal.” I’m not making a point about epidemiology. What I’m saying is that the pandemic has provided a crash course in how government fails even in instances where the case for suspending freedoms is strongest. It’s possible the public may just blame this particular government for “incompetence,” of course. But if they do generalise, then we may find inadvertent new converts to the cause of freedom through cruel experience.
Continue reading this news story at Conservative Home
Loved this article? Read more news from Conservative Home. Or scroll down for related news stories below:
The Daily Reformer publishes conservative internet, talk radio, print, and television news and opinions in one central place, giving you access to conservative news media through our doorway - "The Smart Speedy Take on America's Conservative NEWS".
All trademarks, copyrights, videos, photos and logos are owned by respective news sources. News stories, videos and live streams are from trusted sources.This website is a work in progress. More details and links will be added and modified as they become available.
Access more news stories below: